Reference cleanser time: in George
Orwell’s absolutely brilliant novel 1984, the totalitarian government
that controls the nation of Oceania employs devices called telescreens throughout
society to eternally monitor the captive citizens and ensure their unwavering
obedience. Right, now that I’ve demonstrated that I’ve been through a high
school English writing course, it’s time to get to point-making: I think we
have something rather like telescreens in the real world. Now, I am not
referring to household television sets nor am I suggesting such direct means of
control are in use. Hold back on those sprouting thoughts you’re having about
public security cameras and other surveillance issues, because that isn’t my
point either.
I want to go over what I call,
interestingly enough, “telescreens”. (Now that the audience “huh?”s in
confusion, I’ve successfully hooked them in, you see; another little writing
trick I learned back in high school)
Specifically, think about public
television screens. The moderately short list of places we have them now
includes restaurants, sports bars, gas stations, grocery store waiting lines,
medical and dental waiting rooms, airports, theme park lines, and even
community college cafeterias. Several of these places are also complimented
with the audio invasion of radio, just to make sure that as many avenues of
advertising and entertainment are being pumped out as widely as possible.
Oh, and that’s neverminding that
plenty of SUVs are equipped with flip-down screens, but it does fill in an
interesting gap. 11-year old Jimmy can be lazing on his couch after two hours
of SpongeBob, but his precious third hour is being interrupted by mom going to
the store. Boo. Luckily, he can watch half the episode on the way over to
Ralph’s and the other half on the way back. The grocery shopping itself will be
a bore, but at least the checkout line has flashy, rapid-fire advertisements
keeping him comfortably distracted.
So, this complaint does come right
out of a much older decade, but honestly… why the fuck do we have this much
television? Remember, I don’t mean the actual quantity of material on TV, I
simply mean the omnipresence of access to TV.
This telescreen boom does seem like
a recent phenomenon, something that has grown alongside the explosion of mobile
media. (To clarify, I use “telescreens” from here only in reference to these
public TV sets.) It is hardly a society-changing thing, as we’ve gotten used to
radio being in every corner of the public for decades now. And hey, maybe it is
a convenience for those who do not yet have smart pones and want to check the
weather while filling up their Ford Focus. Great.
I think telescreens are fucking
awful.
I need not name the vast list of
media we all know in order to give you a sense of just how much information the
average American processes in a day. Even the surface problem of the raw data
glut is ridiculous, and that’s before you factor in the madness of advertising
and the siren song of constant entertainment. So, let’s just touch bases on
each point before I lose your precarious interest.
We all know these telescreens are
there. We see them even if we’re not watching. But look carefully at just what
the hell it is we’re really getting on these public screens. At the gas
stations near me, it’s nearly always bite-sized flashes of celebrity news, a
trend dreadful enough for its own future article. In Wal-Mart, it’s
advertisements for shit IN Wal-Mart! You know, advertisements for stuff that is
already IN your goddamned cart! If you want to hang out with your friends at
the college cafeteria, be prepared to grapple attentions with the bloody MTV videos
along the far wall. Stop by Wendy’s and be inundated with ads for pop musicians
and… Carl’s Jr.??? And so on likewise.
The information we’re actually
getting from telescreens is superfluous right off the bat. It’s cut into
vacuous attention-grabbing bites so as to ensure our retention of their
jingles, slogans, and logos. When I went to Comic-Con in 2009, I’ll never
forget what Joss Whedon described as the kind of mind control he sees in the
world. At first, I thought him conspiratorial, but I listened carefully and
realized exactly what he meant: that the world is full of forces trying to
affect the rationale of the individual and trying to think for us.
To bring it full circle, it is not
direct mind control. We have an active choice whether to look or not, yes. But
then the catch: almost anywhere we look, there are telescreens and a means for
insubstantial news and thought-corrupting advertising to have their way. As
long as there are telescreens all over the places where we attain our food,
clothes, and services, the dark side of public media has the power to tell us
what to think, say, and do.
To say we don’t need them is too
passive a suggestion; I say we need to be rid of them. We need be liberated
from the sheer noise mortaring our public space. The trick is, again, not to
rebel in the face of a tyrannical big brother, but to ignore what Cocoa-Cola,
Fox News, and Wal-Mart are yelling at us and think for ourselves.
1 comment:
Televisions require passive receivers.
Post a Comment